Food recalls are on the rise. What happens to the waste?


This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

From contaminated cucumbers to mislabeled energy drinks, food recalls have made several headlines this year. Suppliers and distributors likely do the same thing with those items that public health announcements direct shoppers to do: Throw them away.

The Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Department of Agriculture together oversaw 294 separate food recalls over the first half of 2025, according to a report from compliance firm Sedgwick. The FDA ordered more than twice as many units — nearly 85 million — be destroyed over the first six months of 2024. USDA recalls affected nearly 1.5 million pounds of food, nearly three times as much as the same time last year

While some companies may look for disposal alternatives, sources say most of those items probably end up in the landfill.

“There’s probably a lot of different potential, legally adequate and compliant ways of dealing with this. But everybody has a dumpster,” said Tracy Johnson-Hall, a clinical professor in operations and information systems management at William & Mary.

Other food chain problems like handling mishaps or expiration uncertainty create much higher volumes of food waste, but recalls still play a notable role. A growing number of companies have invested in depackaging technology to enable recovery of this food for recycling, but limited data is available on how much recalled food is included in their volumes. Wary of claims that edible items are getting landfilled or incinerated, multiple recyclers offering certified destruction services declined to speak for this story.

In many cases, items that are recalled, or simply never sent farther along in the supply chain, are perfectly safe for people to eat. These products can often feed into other businesses banking on consumers who are reluctant to see good food go to waste.

Navigating recall regulations

For companies with any goals or directives to cut back on how much of their inventory goes uneaten, there are other sources of waste they might prioritize cutting down on due to their sheer size. Nearly a quarter of all excess food stems from overproduction, for example, while nearly one fifth is never harvested.

Food safety concerns — not including date label issues — contribute to about 2.4% of all food waste generated in the U.S. each year, according to ReFED’s Food Waste Monitor.

Items are most often removed from sale voluntarily as a way of complying with rules set by the FDA and USDA. The federal departments can seize items, however, and help with the inspections and monitoring that catch contaminations and other concerns.

Workforce and funding cuts at the FDA this year could interfere with those activities. As a result, McGuireWoods, writing in the latest edition of the Sedgwick U.S. Recall Index Report, recommended that companies monitor product safety more proactively.

Meanwhile, consumers are expecting better recall systems and safety nets to catch potential problems. During an August webinar, staff from Sedgwick said these expectations make it challenging to see how food recalls could decrease in the coming years.

In theory, brands with recalled items could try and find management solutions that fit somewhere else in the wasted food scale, which places upcycling, converting to animal feed, composting and anaerobic digestion above landfilling. In reality, sources say those options get passed over for a range of reasons. Food products are most likely to be recalled because of allergen contamination — of those, milk is the leading issue — followed by pathogens.

“It’s on you to make sure you don’t put anything into commerce that is going to hurt someone,” says Mark Carter, a food quality and safety consultant and past president of the International Association for Food Protection. Any item with microbial, physical or chemical danger can’t reenter the market.



Leslie Nemo

2025-10-14 15:45:00